Sehidup
Semati | 2024 | 1h 48m
Another Title: Till Death Do Us Part
Genre: Horror / Thriller | Country: Indonesia
Director: Upi Avianto | Writer: Upi Avianto
Cast: Laura Basuki, Ario Bayu, Asmara Abigail
IMDb: 6.3
My Rating: 10/10
Renata, trapped in a marriage filled with violence and suspicions of her husband's infidelity, meets Asmara, her apartment neighbor, who gradually brings change into her life.
Warning:
Contains
scenes of violence, strong language, sensitive topics, smoking, and alcohol.
What
happens when the words “until death do us part” stop sounding like a promise
and start feeling like a sentence?
That
is the uncomfortable thought I had while watching Sehidup Semati (2024).
The film does not present marriage simply as a place where two people love and
protect each other. Instead, it asks what happens when the idea of preserving a
marriage becomes so deeply embedded in someone that she continues to endure
pain, even when the relationship itself has become destructive.
Renata
(Laura Basuki) lives in a marriage that is slowly becoming a nightmare. Edwin
(Ario Bayu) initially appears to love her deeply, which is why Renata chooses
to marry him. But the image of a happy marriage does not last. Edwin changes
and begins physically abusing her.
Her
situation becomes even more complicated because Renata cannot have children.
What makes her circumstances more painful is that she grew up witnessing a
similar relationship between her own parents. Her mother was treated badly by
her father, yet she repeatedly taught Renata that a woman should continue
trying to preserve her marriage.
Renata
hears the same message from religious sermons shown on television and heard in
church: a wife should submit to her husband regardless of what happens.
So
Renata holds on.
She
chooses to protect her marriage even as she experiences treatment that should
never be considered normal. Then another suspicion begins to haunt her. Edwin
appears to be hiding another woman somewhere inside their apartment.
Renata
hears someone humming from one of the rooms. She notices objects moving or
appearing in places where she does not remember leaving them. But Edwin insists
that everything is simply an illusion created by Renata's mind.
That
uncertainty makes the situation even more disturbing. Is Renata discovering
something that Edwin is hiding, or is she gradually losing trust in her own
perception?
Then
Asmara (Asmara Abigail) enters her life.
Asmara
is almost the opposite of Renata. She dresses boldly, lives more freely, and
seems far less concerned about how society judges her. She feels sorry for
Renata and cannot understand why she continues to stay in such a toxic
marriage.
Slowly,
Renata begins to open up to her. She tells Asmara about the problems she has
experienced, including the strange sounds in the apartment and her suspicion
about Ana, a woman whose mother is desperately searching for her after she
mysteriously disappears.
Renata
suspects that Ana may be Edwin's mistress and that she is somehow hiding inside
the apartment.
As
Renata and Asmara become closer, something begins to change in Renata herself.
That
development is one of the things I find most interesting about Sehidup
Semati. The film is not only showing us an abusive marriage. It is also
showing how a person's beliefs can become so deeply rooted that suffering
starts to look like an obligation.
The
idea itself feels disturbingly familiar within societies where patriarchal
values remain strong. Women can still be treated as though they are less
important than men, while husbands are given authority that can easily become
control.
At
the same time, women may be pressured to remain in a marriage at almost any
cost because marriage is supposed to last “for life.” Divorce can still be seen
by some people as shameful, particularly for women. As a result, some women
endure physical or emotional abuse because they have been taught that leaving
means failure.
This
is where I think Sehidup Semati becomes more than a thriller.
It
is a story about the way social expectations can become part of a person's
inner voice.
Renata
is not simply afraid of Edwin. She is also afraid of breaking the rules she has
been taught to follow.
I
find that particularly important because fear does not always come from the
person hurting us. Sometimes it comes from the belief that we are supposed to
tolerate the pain.
The
film presents these ideas in a very artistic way. There are many metaphors,
symbols, indirect conversations, and unusual ways of showing what the
characters are thinking. Instead of explaining everything directly, the film
often asks us to interpret what we see.
I
personally enjoy that style, although I can understand why some viewers may
find parts of the story difficult to follow.
The
dialogue can also be quite harsh, especially when spoken by Asmara. There are
many strong words, but for me, they do not feel excessive or disconnected from
the story. They fit Asmara's personality and, in some scenes, the bluntness
actually gives her words more weight.
The
film's religious perspective may also make the subject sensitive. Because some
of the ideas are presented through the lens of a particular religion, different
viewers may respond differently depending on their own beliefs and
interpretations. I think this part is best approached with an open mind rather
than immediately treating the film as an attack on a particular faith.
Visually,
I really appreciate the contrast between Renata's apartment and Asmara's. The
differences in decoration and color help communicate their personalities
without requiring much dialogue.
Renata's
world feels controlled and restrained, while Asmara's space feels much more
expressive. I like when visual choices can tell us something about a character
before the character even says it.
The
story itself is systematic, and the twists are not especially easy to predict.
At times, I think viewers may feel confused, but that uncertainty becomes part
of the attraction. Sehidup Semati is not the kind of thriller that I
would recommend watching casually. It requires attention because small details
can become important later.
The
performances are another strong point for me. Laura Basuki portrays Renata very
convincingly, particularly the quiet fear and emotional restraint that define
her character. Her physical appearance also changes to fit Renata's
circumstances, which makes the portrayal feel more committed.
The
chemistry between Laura Basuki and Asmara Abigail is also one of the film's
strengths. Their interactions feel natural rather than overly performed, and
the dialogue delivery is generally convincing.
What
I find most interesting, though, is how the film creates horror without relying
heavily on ghosts or cheap jump scares.
The
fear comes from the mind.
It
comes from not knowing whether what you are seeing is real. It comes from
living with someone who makes you question your own perception. It comes from
being trapped inside a situation where the person who should protect you is the
same person you are afraid of.
That
kind of horror feels much closer to reality, and in some ways, that makes it
more disturbing.
The
scene that stayed with me most is when Renata finally visits Asmara's apartment
to spend some time with her. She initially tries to calm herself by drinking a
glass of alcohol that Asmara offers her.
Instead,
Renata ends up drinking directly from the bottle.
And
suddenly, we see a completely different side of her.
I
really like this scene because it feels like something inside Renata finally
breaks loose. The woman who has always been quiet, gentle, anxious, and
restrained suddenly becomes much more expressive.
For
me, the scene says something beyond drinking.
Sometimes
people spend so much energy trying to look fine that they no longer know what
their real emotional state feels like. They suppress anger, fear,
disappointment, and frustration because they believe that keeping everything
under control is the same as being strong.
But
emotions do not simply disappear because we refuse to express them.
At
some point, something becomes the trigger that allows everything we have been
holding inside to come out.
The
line, “Whatever happens, I have to preserve my marriage,” captures the mindset
that keeps Renata trapped.
The
saddest part is that she does not appear to be saying it because she is happy.
She says it because she has been taught that this is what she must do.
And
that made me think about how easily a principle can become harmful when we
follow it without questioning whether it still fits our reality.
Commitment
is valuable. Marriage matters. But protecting a relationship should never
require someone to erase their own dignity, safety, or humanity.
That
is why I find Sehidup Semati (2024) such an interesting psychological
thriller. It uses marriage, social expectations, religious beliefs, fear, and
manipulation to create a kind of horror that does not need supernatural
creatures to feel frightening.
For
me, the film's strongest quality is not simply its twist. It is the way it
makes an ordinary word like “marriage” feel completely different once fear
enters the room.
And
perhaps that is the thought I was left with after watching it: when we keep
holding on to something because we were taught that letting go is wrong, how do
we know whether we are protecting a commitment—or slowly losing ourselves?
(Aluna
Uwie)
Had
been published in Alunauwie.com
"This
article was originally written in Indonesian and has been adapted into English
for international readers."
Read also:
The Photograph Review, an Indonesian drama exploring love, trauma, and the hidden stories behind people’s lives
Parasite in Love Review, a Japanese romance about fear, emotional struggles, and finding acceptance
Love and Leashes Review, a Korean romance that examines unconventional relationships and communication between partners

0 Comments